Vidyut Salaria

Open to opportunities

Problems never stop appearing, and neither does my drive to solve them.

So I build them myself. Six problems, six unrelated domains, all driven by the same instinct.

6
problems found
6
domains
p<.001
when it needed proof
0
safe choices made

How I think

Six problems. Six domains.
Same instinct every time.

01
AI should work with humans
not replace them — that was always the real question
02
Convenience determines adoption
not features. A feature nobody uses doesn't exist.
03
Blind spots matter more than predictions
knowing what you're missing beats a perfect forecast
04
Decisions need traceable evidence
if you can't click the source, don't trust the claim
05
Technology created this problem
so technology should fix it — for people, not engineers
06
Knowledge should be personal
not universal. Built around you, not for everyone.

The principle

I build for myself first.

“If something bothers me enough to fix, statistically it bothers thousands of others. I build for myself. The population follows.”

The story so far

None of this was planned. I finished my MSc without a clear sense of what came next, and chose my dissertation topic hoping it would pass. When the results came back, something shifted: I had designed an experiment from nothing, built the platform to run it, and the data held up. That was the first proof I had that I could take an idea and make it work through resourceful problem-solving, not just theory.

Then came the part nobody puts on a portfolio: months of applying to roles that either did not fit what I wanted or asked for experience I did not have yet. Rather than wait for that loop to break on its own, I started building. Not because every idea was significant, but because each one taught me a new tool, a new problem, a new way of thinking. Six domains later, this page is the result.

Where I'm strong

Compulsive curiosity

I do not pick domains because they are relevant. I pick them because something in them bothers me enough to understand. Psychology, retail, finance, cryptography, strategy, knowledge systems: the through-line is not the subject, it is the need to figure it out.

Finding what's underneath

Every project here started as something else on the surface. The expiry feature existed on every shop till. Nobody asked why nobody used it. The forecast line existed on every stock app. Nobody asked what it could not see. The work is always one layer deeper than the obvious problem.

Shipping past the user story

Most product thinking stops at the user. I think end to end: from identifying the opportunity, to positioning the solution, to how it reaches the customer, to how it generates value. A feature is not done when the user is happy. It is done when the business case closes.

Learning and teaching

I absorb fast and explain clearly. The same instinct that pulls me into a new domain pushes me to make it legible to someone else. I do not hoard what I learn.

Adaptable by default

Solo when the problem needs deep focus. Collaborative when it needs range. Given liberty I will find a better way. Given constraints I will still deliver. Same person, different modes, depending on what the work actually needs.

Right now: actively looking for a role that suits my profile. I ask why before I ask how. Currently based in the UK, open to relocation.

The work

Six self-initiated builds, six domains.

Each one starts with the problem I noticed, not the title.

I had no formal background in most of these domains.
That distance is what let me see what insiders had stopped noticing.

66
Participants
~87%
Performance uplift
p<.001
Statistical significance
η²=.34
Effect size
Why I built this

"Everyone was studying AI performance. Nobody asked what happens to the human when they find out their teammate isn't one."

The actual problem

AI was entering the workplace as a collaborator. Nobody had empirically tested what actually happens to a human working alongside one: emotionally, cognitively, in terms of raw performance. And nobody had asked the specific question: does it matter whether the human knows their teammate is AI?

What was already there

Survey-based studies measuring what people think they feel. Human-to-human teaming experiments with established methodology. Both were safe, low-risk, and already answered. Neither touched the question of human-AI collaboration in real time.

What I shipped

Built a full web application from scratch to run the experiment. It needed to reach participants internationally and track real-time performance metrics across three controlled conditions. 66 participants. ANOVA with Tukey HSD post-hoc. AI-aware participants scored ~87% higher than AI-unaware. p<.001. Effect size η²=.34. Awarded Distinction. Examiners described it as publication-level work. Three domains navigated simultaneously: psychology research, full-stack development, and Russell Group academic standards.

What I didn't build — and why

The easy version was a survey study: hand out questionnaires, analyse responses. Fast, low-risk, acceptable for a dissertation. Cut it because surveys measure what people think they feel, not what they actually do under pressure. Cut human-to-human teaming as the comparison because that question had already been answered. Chose the harder question specifically because it was harder, and because it was interesting enough to actually work on.

What's next

The findings have direct implications for AI deployment strategy in organisations. The next step is translating the academic findings into a practical framework for HR and product teams: when to disclose AI involvement, how transparency affects team dynamics, and what the performance data means for AI product design.

SPSSANOVACustom Web PlatformPANAS ScaleECS Scale
15
PRD sections
6
Alert types
11
API routes
2
Services
3
Forecast models
80%
ARIMA accuracy (MSFT)
6
Python services
0
Paid APIs required
4
Trust states
6
Design documents
Ed25519
Crypto standard
0
PII stored
6
PESTEL categories
5
Pipeline stages
Real URL
Source per point
0
Hallucinated claims
4
Pipeline stages
5+
Page types supported
Swappable
LLM backend
Free
Running cost

The Toolkit

Everything I've picked up.

Across projects, domains, and years of curiosity.

PythonSQLCC++HTMLCSSJavaScript
FlaskNext.jsFastAPINode.jsTailwind CSS
FlutterAndroid StudioXcode
PostgreSQLMongoDBMySQLMS Access
GitGitHubDockerLinux
VercelHerokuRenderRailwayGoogle CloudAWSCloudflareGoDaddy
NumPyPandasMatplotlibTensorFlowPyTorchOpenCVJupyterSPSSsklearnPlotly
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGroqPerplexityMidjourneyOpenAI APIAnthropic APIHugging FaceGitHub Copilot
Kali LinuxWiresharkMetasploitBurpSuiteAircrack-ngJohn the RipperNmapHydraHashcatNetcatHackTheBoxCisco Packet TracerBeEF
MarketlineMintelStatistaGoogle ScholarScopusElsevierUK Gov DataTradingView
SWOTPESTELPorter's Five ForcesRICE ScoringUser Story MappingJobs to be DoneCustomer Journey MappingAgile/ScrumA/B TestingUAT TestingWireframingP&L BasicsPricing Strategy
Statistical AnalysisSurveysInterviewsAcademic JournalsIndustry ReportsObservational Research
JiraAsanaProjectLibreTrelloMonday.comMiroNotion
MS OfficeGoogle WorkspaceSlackMicrosoft TeamsZoomGoogle FormsGrammarly
Google AnalyticsHubSpotPower BITableauPower Query
CanvaBlenderCapCut
CourseraUdemyedXLinkedIn LearningMIT OpenCourseWarefreeCodeCampHackerRank

Certifications

Proof of range.

Formal credentials across product, cloud, data, and strategy.

Featured

Certified Scrum Product Owner (CSPO)

Scrum Alliance

ProductAgile
Sep 2025·Expires Sep 2027

McKinsey Forward Program

McKinsey & Company

StrategyLeadership
Dec 2025

Google Project Management Certificate

Coursera · Google

ProductPM
Oct 2021

EA Product Management Job Simulation

Forage · Electronic Arts

ProductSimulation
Jun 2025

Siemens Mobility PM Job Simulation

Forage · Siemens

Project ManagementKPIs
Sep 2024

AWS Academy Cloud Foundations

Amazon Web Services

CloudAWS
Oct 2021

Also completed

Architecting with Google Compute Engine Specialisation

Coursera · Google Cloud

CloudInfrastructure

Oct 2020

Six Sigma Yellow Belt

Coursera

ProcessQuality

Lean Six Sigma White Belt

Management and Strategy Institute

ProcessLean

Oct 2021

SQL (Intermediate)

HackerRank

SQLData

Apr 2025

What's next

Let's find a problem
worth solving together.

Currently based in the UK. Open to relocation. Looking for a role built around problems worth that level of focus.